AUSTRALIAN GRAVITATIONAL SPACE PROPULSION RESEARCH INNOVATIONS.

HOME

THE KEY TO THE UNIVERSE 1986

INTRODUCTION TO GRAVITATIONAL MECHANICS & GRAVITATIONAL TIME MECHANICS

LETTER TO SCIENCE

THE GRAVITATIONAL MECHANICS (GM 2001)

THE GRAVITATIONAL TIME MECHANICS (GTM) 2001

THE WISE MEN AGSPRI AND THE POEM

GRAVITY RELATED INNOVATIONS

NON GRAVITY RELATED INNOVATIONS OR INVENTIONS

THE MACHINE & THE SPACESHIP

REQUSTED PUBLICATIONS :-UPDATES

LINKS

 


THE CENTRAL MECHANICS OF GRAVITY (GM 2001) 10

In a GM orbit, the graviton messages send by the nucleus to the electron serve for the electron bondage to the nucleus only. While the graviton messages from the electron to the nucleus serve for the displacement of the nucleus. When the electron is approaching the near position to the nucleus at point b in the GM orbit a-c-b-d (FIG. 15), the graviton messages between the nucleus and the electron follow in very tight intervals, due to the short distance (radius) from the source to reception. At the furthest position at a, the message intervals in the arc d-a-c (Fig.15) are expanded, because of the longer source to reception distance (radius), therefore a less frequent centripetal force contra graviton message action response for every electron orbit. This seems in accordance with Isaac Newton’s inverse square law. The direction of the graviton signals forms a square with the electron path for one halves wavelength. The variable velocity of the electron is also a cause to a variable of the duration to the message time interval and it extends into the dimensions (U-2), (U-3) etc. With this statement, we can see how the GM concept can agree with that formula in the micro universe. This also shows a cause for a natural law for the shape of a GM bound state electron orbit. This is due to the variable in bound state electron velocity per orbit. This is suggesting a link to the law for planetary mechanics that Johannes Kepler laid out years ago, "Planets sweep out equal areas in equal time". GM is showing it has an equal, a variation within the angular velocity per electron orbit, caused by the vector force influence. The same mechanics prevail throughout the (U minus) dimensions to accomplish this. The bound state electron is like on a tension intermitted ‘string’ (e.g. the weight in my machine), it is from center nucleus by the centripetal force at all times radial out ward seeking and called back by each graviton message (FIG.14). The GM frequency sent from the nucleus to point a, is only allowing for the electron to recover its previous radius length e-a, unless acted upon by another force! Because the deceleration vector force effect acting from d to a, has by then, slowed the electron sufficiently down, preventing it to enter into a greater radius, or to escape the orbit. The electron is then ready for the return, accelerating from a, to c. The nucleus, (disregarding its spin) is stationary, it is centripetal force (U-1) unidirectional wise neutral. It is free for displacement in any direction! Because of the nature of the elliptic orbit between a-e-b and the position e of the nucleus within! The nucleus of (U-1) will therefore, in separate vibrating movements, draw in an alternating way toward the electron, into direction a or b, per cycle (per single frequency). This movement is predominantly into direction a. That is, due to the difference in the electron graviton messages (the nucleus response time (NRT)) between direction e-a and e-b. All this may seem over the top, but it takes a bit of thought to realize the mechanical truth in this. When the electron approaches from the outward elliptic arc and draws close to the nucleus, there is a continuously decreasing time interval gap between each graviton signal especially in arc c-b-d (FIG.15). Therefor, the nucleus sent graviton (come back) message to the electron is responded by the GM of (U-2) within that electron, more frequent. That is why, the electron is drawing closer to the nucleus for about 180 0 from before point c, to b, to d, (FIG.14). In arc a, c, b the from centre nucleus directed graviton (come back) signal, is now vector force wise, also a signal that leads in to an acceleration of the bound state electron, once past point a then accelerates to point c. Visa versa, when the electron moves beyond point d, the graviton (come back) message from the nucleus vector force wise, leads in to a deceleration of the angular electron velocity between d and a. The electron will pass point a (FIG.15) therefore with less angular velocity than point b. Bearing in mind, that for any induced electron orbit elongation variable, the acceleration distance a-c-b should always be proportional to the opposing deceleration distance b-d-a in a proportional length (bulge) to create an equilibrium effect. By this knowledge one should be able to determine the GM orbit shape mathematically. This seems to be a natural electron anti escape law, under normal circumstances. The greater time interval between each graviton message at arc d-a-c, compared to arc c-b-d between each (come back) signal from the nucleus, for the electron to respond has a complex effect. Because of the centripetal force in the electron saying "move out, move out" and the message from the nucleus saying "come back, come back"! The most infinite small (move out- come back) two way, inward outward wobble should occur. That is at approx.8.3x1027 times (GM bundles) per second (8.3x1027 HZ) or a GM vibration of 8.3 x1027/40000 = 2.08x1023 times (GM bundles) per (U-1) electron orbit caused by the (U-2) atoms bound state electrons within the (U-1) electrons. Resulting in an extra orbital secondary vibration (a wave) per (U-1) bound state electron orbit and there is also a variation within each wavelength and the direction of this wave. These vibrations (frequency) of (U-2) are actually the gravitons (the messages) with which the nucleus and the electrons in the atoms of (U-1) communicate. The mechanics that create them and the GM functions are ratio wise exactly the same throughout all the minus dimensions. (For detail see the dimension chart). The electron acting like a wave has been identified at Niels Bohr’s time correctly. According to GM the electron should only act as a wave when it is in a bound state, not in a (electron) radiating state, as in TV picture tubes etc, then only a directional linear vibration should be present. (FIG. 15, (GM 2001) 10). By the difference of this electron vibration between orbit position a and b it should be possible to determine the position of the bound state electron per orbit, if such electronic equipment is available. The displayed waveform is not an accurate one (Fig ?). "The electron is a wave"; we are borrowing in a sense from Louis de Broglie, but it is not the quantum wave. Explained in 'The bound state electron waves (GM 2001)’ 12. This above commands an extra addition of thought. Because of the vector force induced GM acceleration and deceleration and the wave created by the (U-2) atoms GM response within the bound state electron (U-1). Again, this (U-2) graviton communication within (U-1) atoms is transmitted by the nucleus. It is creating one half wave and the centripetal force is responsible for the reminder, the other half of the wave. This single, complete GM wave and every following wave is lined up in a 900 angle to the graviton transmission line of centre nucleus (U-1). This graviton message response (FIG. 15, and 17, (GM 2001) 10), is over riding for every one half wave length the centripetal force. Then giving way for the next half wavelength, to the centripetal force in a repeating sequence etc., This message is transmitted from the nucleus, from within the mass of the (U-2) atoms radial for 3600 in a possible elliptic orbit, to the bound state electrons. We must here consider that this does not create a true electromagnetic wave train but a per message individual two-way vibration, caused by two equal opposing, but indifferent technically functioning, forces. Consequently not one wave is truly aligned with the following single complete wave, in any of the minus dimensions to the tangent of the bound state electron orbits due to the angle of response! Nor are they all the same wavelength within one electron orbit! Due to the 3600 radius length variable, causing a graviton message at C transmission intermittent variable, hence a centripetal force duration variable. Therefore, there is no standing wave interference, within the bound state electron orbit for this frequency in the atoms in any dimension. Further, because of the vector force induced GM acceleration and deceleration effect per orbit, imposed onto the bound state electron (U-1) by the nucleus, the electron has to be considered having a mean angular velocity below the speed of light. However, if by Niels Bohr, speed of light taken velocity for the Z1 electron orbit, stands firm then it has to be considered that the bound state electron surpasses the speed of light, at some stage, (for some distance) in every GM orbit around the nucleus in an atom. This is to make up for lost time due to the vector force caused deceleration effect. Now the electron graviton message to the nucleus (follow me), is because of the electron velocity variable and the greater orbit length of the arc d-a-c, to centre nucleus e, compared to the arc c-b-d, received and responded to, excessive into direction a, than into direction b, (FIG.15). In position a, by arc distance a(d+a+c)C = at in position b, by arc distance b(c+b+d)C = bt therefore at minus bt equals GM nucleus response time (NRT). As a result, the nucleus follows up proportional in infinite increments of distance per (U-1) electron orbit, towards position a, and so with, the atom. The difference of the graviton messages times nucleus response in an atom, between point a and b, is a GM force. For our planet e.g. centre earth directed, mass accelerating at 9.8m/sec2 or in an earth rest mass situation, the constant centre earth seeking pressure expressed as weight, that is gravity, by this GM concept. Reviewed 16 .6. 02. 22.6.02. 24.6.02. b 28.6.02 29.6.02 30.6.02 b, 1.7.02 b,c,d,e. 2.7.02

 

(Please click on these titles below)

2-THE FUNCTION OF THE CENTRIPETAL FORCE MANIPULATOR. (GM 2001)
3-
GM IN ATOMS. (GM 2001)
4-
THE DIRECTIONAL GM IN ATOMS (GM 2001)
5-PROPOSALS FOR EQUAL OPPOSITE ON EARTH HIGH AND LOW TIDES BY GM.
6-THE GM IN THE GALACTIC SYSTEM
7-A POSSIBLE DIFFERENCE IN GM VIBRATION CODE FREQUENCIES
8-THE POSSIBLE REALITIES OF GM
9-THE STRING OF THE MACHINE! IN GM IN AN ATOM, WHAT REPLACES IT?

11- THE NATURAL FORMATION OF GM ORBITS

12-THE BOUND STATE ELECTRON WAVES (to be released at later date)

Related Articles
{related2}
 
 

Nowra NSW AUSTRALIA agspri@bigpond.com