AUSTRALIAN GRAVITATIONAL SPACE PROPULSION RESEARCH INNOVATIONS.

HOME

THE KEY TO THE UNIVERSE 1986

INTRODUCTION TO GRAVITATIONAL MECHANICS & GRAVITATIONAL TIME MECHANICS

LETTER TO SCIENCE

THE GRAVITATIONAL MECHANICS (GM 2001)

THE GRAVITATIONAL TIME MECHANICS (GTM) 2001

THE WISE MEN AGSPRI AND THE POEM

GRAVITY RELATED INNOVATIONS

NON GRAVITY RELATED INNOVATIONS OR INVENTIONS

THE MACHINE & THE SPACESHIP

REQUSTED PUBLICATIONS :-UPDATES

LINKS

 


THE NATURAL FORMATION OF GM ORBITS (GM 2001) 11


The problem is, if my machine hadn’t taught me other wise, I’d swear that what I’m writing here, should function the other way around. Because at arc c-b-d (FIG.15, (GM 2001) 10), there are more graviton messages in shorter time intervals, while at arc d-a-c, there are less response messages in longer time intervals. Where is the assurance that there is a difference in graviton message response times, at point a over point b? That is where there seems to be a natural law to shape a GM orbit. This is because of the planets heavy matter compressed core. From there like from the nucleus, from the centre of mass amplified by the total mass it says, "come to me, come to me", and the bound state electrons in the atoms of (U-2) within (U-1) respond by keeping the (U-1) electron for a longer time in arc section d-a-c (Fig.14). Thereby elongating it’s GM orbit, from centre nucleus to point a. This is creating an elliptic elongation of the arc section d-a-c, proportional to the strength of the graviton signal (U-1), from centre mass. Hence a GM situation naturally created, required orbit shape proportional to the intensity of the GM frequency emitted from centre mass, proportional to the volume of that mass. This orbit shape is probably similar to Bohrs and Sommerfields, in its structure (FIG.16)! There may be a variety in length and shape, this may be calculable because of some factor dependence such as 1, the bound state electron angular velocity variable within every orbit. 2 the bound state electron orbit GM elongation variable. 3 the bound state electrons orbit impede effect by the vector force. 4 the variable bound state electron velocity effect to the graviton messages at velocity C, between the nucleus and the electron. 5 the electron graviton message intermittent variable and the centripetal force wave step co-ordinate. 6 the bound state electron variable velocity effect, to the interval between graviton messages and 7 a consideration of the Niels Bohr mass ratio factor between the electron to the nucleus at 1:1840. Hence the electron may need an orbital adjustment for arc d-a-c to compensate for that. The orbit should be elliptical, (FIG. 17, (GM 2001) 10), but it does not necessarily have to have the artificial orbit shape, (FIG.1), important is the position of the nucleus within any orbit shape. Because, pardon me, we are talking here about the (centripeviton) force, the half wave, graviton message responds, restricting the centripetal force to a half wave thus forming one GM wave. Important is that the graviton messages received by the nucleus from the electron from direction a, exceed those received for direction b in numbers, depending on the GM orbit shape. This, to the power of gravity proportional orbit length variable, from centre nucleus to position a, also regulates the difference between planet surface gravity in a normal solar system, as for example between earth and moon, beyond that, it is GTM. This is a natural process, where one thing leads into another and an action calls for a re- action. In a marvelous interacting, self sustained efficient circle. And if we think we know better, He said, " he who believes that the all itself is deficient is himself completely deficient".
I’d like to say in times past, some truly explorative thinkers, many scientists in a sense, where chastised by religion. May hopes sustain, true advance, for mankind, will never suffer an equal fate, by science itself.
Revised 16.6.02. b, 21.6.02 30.6.02 1.7.02 b, c. 2.7.02

 

(Please click on these titles below)

2-THE FUNCTION OF THE CENTRIPETAL FORCE MANIPULATOR. (GM 2001)
3-
GM IN ATOMS. (GM 2001)
4-
THE DIRECTIONAL GM IN ATOMS (GM 2001)
5-PROPOSALS FOR EQUAL OPPOSITE ON EARTH HIGH AND LOW TIDES BY GM.
6-THE GM IN THE GALACTIC SYSTEM
7-A POSSIBLE DIFFERENCE IN GM VIBRATION CODE FREQUENCIES
8-THE POSSIBLE REALITIES OF GM
9-THE STRING OF THE MACHINE! IN GM IN AN ATOM, WHAT REPLACES IT?
10-THE CENTRAL MECHANICS OF GRAVITY

12-THE BOUND STATE ELECTRON WAVES (to be released at later date)

Related Articles
{related2}
 
 

Nowra NSW AUSTRALIA agspri@bigpond.com