|
HOME
THE
KEY TO THE UNIVERSE 1986
INTRODUCTION
TO GRAVITATIONAL MECHANICS & GRAVITATIONAL TIME MECHANICS
LETTER
TO SCIENCE
THE
GRAVITATIONAL MECHANICS (GM 2001)
THE
GRAVITATIONAL TIME MECHANICS (GTM) 2001
THE
WISE MEN AGSPRI AND THE POEM
GRAVITY
RELATED INNOVATIONS
NON
GRAVITY RELATED INNOVATIONS OR INVENTIONS
THE
MACHINE & THE SPACESHIP
REQUSTED
PUBLICATIONS :-UPDATES
LINKS
|
THE
KEY TO THE UNIVERSE
SMH.
1986 news paper article Extract.
This
is an article that wrote in 1986 and it was published in a news paper
in Sydney the Sydney Morning Herald. This is an introduction to my work
on the function of gravity which is based on an invention that converts
rotational momentum in to linear momentum, the basic suspected function
of alien space craft.
The key to
the universe was a result at that time, of 27 years of thought and experiments.
But as publication it failed to be widely understood, because of my
education and therefor the presentation. A scientist that visited me,
said to me, after I explained some of my thoughts to him." If you
could have presented your work in science language, you would have had
a wider responds." In addition I had written the article in a way,
as not to give too much away. Rather if people wanted to know, I would
have liked, to explain it on a radio talk back show or on TV. I missed
out with the famous John Laws trying to get in contact with me, as his
listeners phoned in, by responding to the story advertised in the SMH.
The computer is my english education now as the calculator is for my
mathematics. It is probably not good enough, but I will give it a go.
There must be some people out there interested in what I have to say
no matter how I write it. To understand the function of gravity and
use it to conquer the universe.
Original news paper artical image
THE
KEY TO THE UNIVERSE
The
finite and the infinite force Extract
The
finite force, finite at the speed of light, - "could it be and
if so could the force be infinite?" Here is one thought why, if
we take the approximately gravitational value of 10 m seconds²
, then (seconds ²) is the proof of infinity,
for if for every object falling down to earth the final crash would
not happen the acceleration has to go on forever and so the force.
When Isaac Newton put things in order he said, that the apple didn’t
fall from the tree to the ground, as his forebears observed but the
gravitational force of our planet was pulling the apple down, that was
a great step those days, yet the truth is that the apple drives down
to the surface of the earth from the tree under its own force, centre
earth seeking, and that is the base of this knowledge of the future.
To prove just that the first invention is the mechanical machine That
represents the gravitational mechanics of the hydrogen .atom.
If the first presumption was correct, the gravitational power to account
for a neutron star could be derived from the power of U- 1 that is if
the earth electron radius increases per increase Frequency of the earth
core.
This way of course a (universe -2) would not be necessary, yet since
a greater gravitational power in the galaxy is evident in greater density
of matter, like neutron stars , that makes a thought like that doubtful.
(Numbers in red are to the power of)
Finding the frequency for U – 2 one would have to calculate The
frequency range between universe and U-1 which is known (cesium atom
9.2 x 109) then for every orbit
of earth around the sun in 31536000 seconds the cesium atom does, the
electron that is, 9.2 x 109 per
second. Therefore, for every cycle of earth universe U – 1 does
(9.2 x109) 3156000 rotations =(9.2
x 109) x (3.2 x 107)
= (2.9 x 1017) the difference between
U. and U-1.
Now for every cycle of the electron of U – 1, U –2 does 2.9
x 1017Yet U –1 does 9.2 x 109
(cesium atom) per second, therefore The frequency for universe –
2 is (9.2 x 109) x (2.9 x 1017)
=2.7 x 1027 per second.
The mechanical function of the bodies in the universe.
By the function of the infinite force, if presumed similar mechanically
between universe and micro universe. It could be possible that a moon
orbiting a planet would exert a drag on the tail end of the same, thereby
slowing down the angular velocity of the planet in time. The planet
would draw closer to the sun and eventually plunge into the same creating
a splash which would give birth to a new planet. A planet that came
close to the sun and lost its moon, could still have the same destiny
as the next planet moon system draws closer, a collision could occur
equal to a billiard game forcing one or the other out into deep space
to begin the journey all over again or to be rinsed in fire and than
to be reborn, the same fate stands to reason for the sun being slowed
down by her planets to dive into the center of the galaxy to die only
to give birth to a new star. The galaxies since they come in all sizes,
also, if a small one orbiting a medium one and both together orbit a
galaxy or galaxies the same live circle retains. The implications? If
the unique earth – sun distance to allow the creation of live as
we know it, happens to every planet, provided he is in marriage to at
least one moon, then how much live is there in the universe? It takes
only 36 days to reach the andromeda galaxy, in second gear, are the
UFO’ real or are they an evolutionary vision of the mind? If so
are we the only ones? If so is it worth to make war for any reason?
If so then, atoms call each other by frequency, like birds call their
mates. If planets, stars and galaxies die to be reborn, how deep are
the roots of all basic things. What did Jesus mean when he said "Our
Father is within all of us" Who knows? God does.
Original news paper artical
image
NASA Letters
The Key To The Universe new publication
Mass Propellant Ship
Centrifugal Force Manipulator
|
Related Articles
Original news paper artical
image
NASA Letters
The Key To The Universe new publication
Mass Propellant Ship
Centrifugal Force Manipulator
|
