KEY TO THE UNIVERSE 1986
TO GRAVITATIONAL MECHANICS & GRAVITATIONAL TIME MECHANICS
GRAVITATIONAL MECHANICS (GM 2001)
GRAVITATIONAL TIME MECHANICS (GTM) 2001
WISE MEN AGSPRI AND THE POEM
GRAVITY RELATED INNOVATIONS OR INVENTIONS
MACHINE & THE SPACESHIP
KEY TO THE UNIVERSE
article was written in 1997, and given to a friend of mine Bill, who
was a member of the board from the magazine Exposure, and that he may
be able to have my writing published. Bill himself, is an accomplished
inventor, challenging in some of his published writings, Albert Einstein's
relativity theory speed limit of light, for all mass.
TO THE UNIVERSE
presenting my writing on the following subject, I would like to point
out that the staggering scientific progress in every field up to date
has been achieved to my knowledge, without ever assigning a basic mechanism
to either gravity or time. Acknowledging Sir Isaac Newton as the founder
of the principles of gravity and if for a deeper understanding I refer
to Prof. Einstein. It will give me space curvature and the final step
gives me gravitons, the messenger particle theory, if I select a scientific
expression for time, I have space-time. To make myself clear setting
aside solar cell technology, I say that if electricity could be understood
to a basic mechanical level beyond the coulomb theory, shouldnt
it be possible to create a device by which the heat for example of a
blowtorch can be converted into an electric current at a minimum loss
of energy! In the same sense if a form of gravitational mechanics where
applied shouldnt it be possible to explain gravity related phenomenon
and advance in the basic understanding of matters like UFO's!
I'd like you to view my effort in this frame, this article and a possible
follow up could be a delight for chronic thinkers.
I am basically an inventor that ventured into science actively through
a never ending attempt to find a way to propel a spaceship by the manipulation
of the centripetal or centrifugal force. The beginning of this research
stretches nearly 40 years, hoping and considering my limits that the
answers are found in simplicity rather than in complexity.
In an article that I wrote and advertised in the Sydney Morning Herald
In 1986, "THE KEY TO THE UNIVERSE" I outlined an alternative
way of the function of gravity. At that point my work was entering electronics
from years of mechanical attempts. Having no expertise in that field
I thought I needed help, but because of my unscientific presentation
the response to my article was very sparse.
Yet thinking about it now, it was well worth it in spite of that because
people like Frank, a man that contacted me and said he was a scientist
helped me to demolish my mathematical insecurity by saying "Gunther,
it doesn't matter if you don't master calculus if you can prove your
work arithmetically the simpler the better".
John, an electronic experimental officer from a university gave me an
idea to start my first electronic experiments. John himself had a gravitational
theory, he stated that "the electric field of a single atom would
unite with that of the second atom, the two electric fields would become
one, then combining with the third atom etc, so that a force field grew
as mass increased and with it the gravitational force, so explaining
gravitational and molecular adhesion".
At the Astro inauguration gathering to which I was invited starting
under the name of" ...Mad Scientists!" I met a young man also
named John. His complex postulation of gravity which he handed over
to me and of which he wanted my opinion was mainly designed to contradict
the big bang theory.
As I understood John, gravity is a universal force (mass) dwelling through
the whole of the universe flowing continuously into every star, planet,
moon etc., that the continuous flow of the force into distant stellar
mass from our viewpoint on earth was the cause of the redshift. This
means the universe is not expanding.
Help came in various ways for instance; to understand John's universal
gravity flow I had to read more about Einstein and better my understanding
for his work, that helped me in my work, in the contribution of the
key scientist is a harvest of building blocks that you may put differently
together or of some you may not use, just the same they are the foundation
for our thoughts. These men may have left at some point because of knowledge
that was not available at that time, not because their intellect couldnt
carry them any further. Einstein left the explanation of gravity to
my understanding as space curvature.
For my part I had my 1986 patent pending machine that centrifugal centripetal
force manipulator, a device that converted rotational momentum into
To conventional science the great Isaac Newton still holds firm:"for
every force there is an equal and opposite force." Einstein I think
was not aware that you can create a single unidirectional force from
within. However in approximately 1966 a primitive centrifugal
device hoppeled into one direction on my workbench.
19 years later, after fruitless experiments in all angles I concluded
that a mechanical
device could not develop a linear force from within to create a power
needed to lift a spaceship. Yet the force was there approximately 0.5
Newton from a device about 30cm in diameter.
Sometime back the thought had entered my mind that if every atom functioned
naturally like my machine this insignificantly amount of a linear force,
centre earth directed, by every atom on this planet, could account for
the power of gravity. Gravity simply then becomes a mechanically enduced
linear force created by the electrons orbiting the nucleus. The same
principle as my invention.Where a weight in the shape of a cylindrical
piece of iron, orbits the body of the machine. This orbit is manipulated
in its lengths of the radius, by a variation of the angular velocity
and in a sense by a variation in the weight, per orbit. I believe this
device could then be considered the working model of a hydrogen atom.
To express my point in 1986, I wrote "When Isaac Newton put things
in order he said "that the apple didn't fall from the tree to the
ground as his forebears observed but that the gravitational force of
our planet was pulling the apple down to the surface of the earth."
That was a great step in those days. The truth is, that the apple drives
down to the surface of the earth from the tree under its own force centre
earth seeking and that is the basis of my knowledge for the future."
By now you must
be wondering what Im trying to get at. Simply this, if we want
to seriously understand UFO's you must be aware of either the technology
or part of it or we must at least understand the working of gravity;
as that is what we are dealing with.
To make mass excel to and beyond the speed of light I wrote in 1986
in my article explaining infinitive gravitational excelleration "if
we take the approximate gravitational force of 10m seconds²
then (10m seconds²)
is the proof of infinity, for if for every object falling towards earth
the final crash would not happen, the acceleration has to go on for
ever and so the force."(Isaac Newton "any object can be made
to accelerate to infinity").
We must understand here that, in space travel, according to my gravitational
mechanics we are falling through space,at a continues acceleration of
1 G infirst gear, we are not being conventional propelled and that the
atoms of our body are under the same command with those of the spacecraft
we are not affectedby a sudden change of direction or acceleration.
If we can except gravity in such a basic form, we are then provided
with a foundation stone of thought, from which a human mind can progress,
to understand and master such a force.
Ideas such as space curvature, the graviton particle message theory,
a gravitational proposals such as the universal flow of the force into
stellar mass or an atom uniting electric force field, etc, each idea
by itselve applied as a solution to the whole problem, permits only
a narrow scope for the clarification of the complex phenomenon that
we are faced with.On the other hand for what we don't know there are
many ways to inform ourselves. We can follow the Van Daniken's to sift
through the past. Yet how can we understand the past if we havent
got enough engineering or scientific knowledge to understand the present
on the doorstep into the future? We can also sort through the expert
presentation of observed facts combined with the thoughts of highly
competent journalists, it still doesn't revel to us the base knowledge.
If Van Daniken had that on his last TV clip in his explanations and
speculations he could have gone far beyond himself for what he visually
presented. If William Cooper the journalist (article in" Exposure")
had it, besides the interesting political aspect he presented, the technical
remark would have acceded his description "nuts and bolts"
The road to the truth is barricaded. I mentioned that ten years ago
in my article since then I experienced the following. In my talks with
John an electronic expert, he said "Gunther, for what I know about
electronics your idea can never work." His friend studying for
a doctor degree in electronics at the time, being present agreed with
John and his comment was even more negative.
At an energy and inventors fair at Darling Harbor some years ago where
I displayed some of my inventions, I had written material, video footage
and models of my work. One person about my age well spoken with an intellectual
face wanted to buy one of my pamphlets on display about my ideas on
gravity. He acted very nervous as if he had no time or as if he was
worried to be seen. I felt he was embarrassed to deal with me.
A man in his mid twenties introducing himself as an engineering student
also wanted to buy a copy. After looking through it and watching the
display on the subject on the video he started to argue that if the
centrifugal force manipulator was placed out into space at zero gravity
it would not work. It did not matter that I explained to him that this
was the working model of a hydrogen atom and that an atom had a certain
stability, in its envelope especially combined with other atoms, that
the concrete surface on which the machine performed provided that equal
environment. At the end the young man did not purchase it. He was already
educated beyond the clear open mind you need to preserve,
to reach further then others, into the unknown.
A secretary to a professor of science examined the work that I sent
to a university in Australia wrote to me the following:
Dear Mr Pfrengle
May I point out to you that gravity is a property of mass and not of
every single atom. You could benefit by reading a book by Paul Davis
explaining the state of science to the present day. So I did buy the
book it told me that gravitons (messenger particles)travelling between
my body and the earth surface constantly back and forth to tell my mass
to hang on! Next question, how does my mass accomplish just that? Great
progress since Einstein is it, or isn't it? A well spoken middle aged
lady at the inauguration of Astro (Alternative Science and Technologies
Research Organization) said to me" did you ever hear about the
big cover up, the Philadelphia experiment and so on. Not really I replied,
well she continued all that you are trying to do, has been done before
it is only kept secret at the highest level". If some of you out
there are interested in the UFO scenario believe that, let me tell you
something first. About 6 years ago I discovered a (missing) link between
time and gravity. When you put the three together; arithmetically with
a little algebra, a twelve year old could work the calculations make
scientific sense out of Einsteins time dilation and understand
the working interaction between time and gravity.With an inventive mind
you would have a scientific excursion through the function of the mechanics
of the universe from end to infinity beyond your present dreams, followed
by an awakening to immense improvements to the most important basic
necessities to comfort save and sustain our lives on earth. And with
the knowledge of this, I ask you, to tell me, the big cover up if it
exists! That means that handfuls of people on this earth are masters
of say, gravity but if you are a master of gravity you are also a master
of time or visa versa, because one is in a sense the other and if you
are a master of time, then tell me again, why would you want to die
within an average of 70 years! Why not slow your earth years down then
poke your head out now and then to see whats going on or if your
term of life is near a critical point have some body visit you to inform
you about the latest. Why have your body snap frozen, after an ailment
took your life, awaiting the ultimate in medical science. Why not change
one earth day into ten inner space time years? Why are the great scientists
and the powerful leaders of this world exit on cuelike every pooper!
If some of these people have that knowledge tell me why? Could it be
that this matter is nationally so imperative, to the scientific pride,
that one pretends to know the secret and then when somebody else should
invent it to be able to say,
we have done all this years ago. Let me point out that this kind of
space technology seems only possible since the digital electronic age
and that is not so long ago. So, if you want to enter reality dont
make the past the ultimate in research, that is the past, dont
get entangled to deep into to days reports visual or otherwise because
that is the future, at the moment still beyond us. Lets be practical,
pick the path of an inventor for a change, come along with me for a
moment. I am always eager to publish my progress of thought. Consider
that the supreme product of an evolution will enter ultimately into
the period of a mental evolution which is seeded in each one of that
species in the form of intelligence leading into intellect. Advancing
in a Darwinien progression where only the best individual solutions
survive into the next phase. This does not have to end in self destruction
if each of us cares enough and those that lead us do not ignorantly
and egoistically stifle the branches of the key technology that brings
us to a higher quality of existence, it must include at some stage the
technology to gravitational propulsion, or else we stay earthbound and
We should therefore examine every contribution; you may be inspired,to
generate the lingering but unsurfaced ideas with in you and develop
them to tell us about it. If you were to think deep about what I wrote
in 1986 and what I write here you have already a base by which you can
explain levitation, the psychic moving of objects, by some gifted persons
and of course gravity itself which explains the function of UFOs etc.
In 1986 I proposed that the gravitational force, being the property
of every single atom; was directed centre earth seeking, by a frequency
emitted from the earth centre.
The aproximate centifugal/centripetal force manipulator weight
Bohr-Sommerfeld electron orbit.
My idea at that
time was an atomic vibration (Niels Bohr),possibly to be found as a
code frequency within the electro magnetic radiation spectrum. What
I didn't know, when I wrote the article, was that people as far back
as the discovery of the x-ray by Roentgen, thought that there was a
frequency for everything including gravity.Nobody I know of had presented
since Roentgen an atomic mechanical solution, so I am sure that people
worked on centrifugal force manipulations but did not transfer that
mechanism, in thought, to the function of an atom.To fall in line with
science today. lets presume for the moment that it is not a code frequency
but gravitons that guide the direction of the gravitational force of
every single atom. Then the psychic phenomenon of objects moving or
flying through a room, levitation, UFO's etc, explains itself by either
gravitons being guided mind controlled conciously,unconciuosly or purposely
electronically into mass to change the gravitational mechanics of the
atoms, beingcentre earth controlled, between 1 to 180 degrees, in respect
to the surface of the planet.
Transmittion of gravitons or electromagnetic gravitational
vibration code frequency.
Development of spacecrafts based on the gravitational
mechanics of the earth.
Flight direction of spacecraft according to the gravitational
The spaceship a quarter earth diagram with no mass in opposition
and if the graviton transmission is continuos we are falling through
space accelerating infinitive.
With my knowledge
a few years ago I wrote a story explaining an UFO event in the Nullabor
region where I described the sighting as being a space animal. I sent
the story to a couple of newspapers guess what? No takers! But still
as you can see if you invent a solution you can postulate explaining
phenomenon and that could be more beneficial for progres than digging
in the past or go beyond.
Applying this knowledge to the function of the universe I wrote in 1986.
"By the function of the infinite force (gravitational mechanics),
if presumed to be similar mechanics between the universe and the micro
universe (Einstein) it would be possible for a moon orbiting a planet
to exert a drag on the tail end of the planet orbiting the sun thereby
slowing down the angular velocity of the planet in time. The planet
would ultimately draw closer to the sun and eventually plunge into it,
creating a splash, which would give birth to a new planet, (To be rinsed
in fire and then to be reborn).The same fate stands to reason for the
sun being slowed down by her planets to dive into the centre of a galaxy!
The galaxies, since they come in all sizes, also if a small one orbiting
a medium one and both
together orbit a large galaxy or galaxies the same cycle could retain.
If we imagine that every planet accompanied by at least one moon of
every solar system in the universe would enter eventually into an orbit,
where live forms as we know them evolve and sustain for millions of
years, provided the mass composition and spin of that planet creates
surface and atmospheric conditions like that on earth. Then how much
live would there be in the universe?And most of you wonder still, whether
UFOs are real! Again if you have an open inventive mind you can see
far beyond the conservatism of some modern intellect. Also
some prominent scientists do have the gut feeling when professor John
Archibald Wheeler suggested" Until we know the true constitution
of the world, I think we have to depend much more on what wise men of
the past have told us ......" and that phrase (rinsed in fire.....)
comes from the wisest known to men.
Karl Heinz Pfrengle
news paper artical image
news paper artical image