THE
KEY TO THE UNIVERSE 1986
INTRODUCTION
TO GRAVITATIONAL MECHANICS & GRAVITATIONAL TIME MECHANICS
LETTER
TO SCIENCE
THE
GRAVITATIONAL MECHANICS (GM 2001)
THE
GRAVITATIONAL TIME MECHANICS (GTM) 2001
THE
WISE MEN AGSPRI AND THE POEM
GRAVITY
RELATED INNOVATIONS
NON
GRAVITY RELATED INNOVATIONS OR INVENTIONS
THE
MACHINE & THE SPACESHIP
REQUSTED
PUBLICATIONS :UPDATES
LINKS

MATHEMATICAL EXPLANATION. version 3
MATHEMATICAL EXPLANATION. version 3
This is a mathematical explanation concerning parallels between outer
spacetime (OST) and inner spacetime (IST) calculations, by using the
GTM chart. According to an older textbook the mass of our solar system
excluding moons comes to 3.505 x 10^{27} m^{3} at earth
density. That multiplied by approx. 1.0 x 10^{11} solar systems
per galaxy = 3.505 x 10^{38} m^{3}. That multiplied
by 1.0 x 10^{11} galaxies in the universe = 3.505 x 10^{49}
m^{3} this is the approx. mass of the universe. Convert that
into a sphere, the radius of that is approx. 2.23 x 10^{16}
m, divide that by the speed of light m/s = 74,534,753 sec. (863 days).
This is the approx. time (by the rough estimation above) it would take
for the big bang to expand the universe, from an ‘electron’
size, to an earth lavasoup stage sphere, at the speed of C, OST (earth
Base1). But after the big crunch we are dealing with IST, so we have
to convert these 74,534,753 OST seconds each, into IST parallel time
quantities. Converting OST to parallel IST, it takes 103 consecutive
(2^{103}) steps into IST (see GTM chart), from Earth Base1,
to an electron size crunch. At this level every one of the above OST
seconds is IST time expanded to (2^{103})^{3} = approx.
of 1.04296242 x 10^{93} seconds, according to the GTM chart.
Which really means that one second IST is parallel extended, or equal,
to 1.04296242 x 10^{93} seconds. That is as 74,534,753 time
bundles of 1.04296242 x 10^{93}seconds OST B1. Every such time
bundle, is time receding in value, during the first 74,534,753 time
bundles of the C expansion by the big bang, from, 1.04296242 x 10^{93}
seconds electron size IST ratio to the soup sphere of step 95 row 3
= (2^{95})^{3} = 6.22 x 10^{85} seconds and
from there expanding to ratio 1:1 seconds B1, earth planetary environment.
This means within the time frame of the chemical / nuclear process
of B1 as compaired to B(2^{95)}^{. }If these receding
time quantities are summed up only over 75,534,753 OST seconds to the
soup sphere as time sections, the sum is staggering (5.59346051 x 10^{80}
years). It is a time lock, an immense black hole. Than receding from
this time frame (the last time bundle), of 6.22 x 10^{85} seconds
again over approx. 3x 74,534,753 time bundles to ratio 1:1 seconds B1,
summed up, as and to above we have a conventional big bang time (universe
age) dilemma. Not to mention the question! What is OST with the universe
missing for such a long time? Obviously, one can gauge periods of near
empty outer space (OS minus T) with this system, provided that if one
universe is closing down another one is not opening up in its wake.
That would allow extra reasoning for the mechanics and the cause of
the big crunch.
IST POWER OF GRAVITY BY GTM
According to the GTM chart the 12th step (2^{12}) into IST row
4 shows a 4096 times increase of gravity. But parallel column 12 at
row 3, the time dilation is 1/68719476740 second to one second B1 OST
or 1 second IST is equal to 68719476740 seconds OST. This could account
for gravity said to be withering away by IST or being diluted by time.
This seems to make time more dominant than gravity. Best to understand
this is by the mechanics of one (special) manpower were 100 kg are
lifted 1m high in one second OST. A person in a 12th step IST situation
has (2^{12})^{3} 6.87 x 10^{10} OST seconds,
as 1 IST second to lift this weight 1/2048 of one meter. So when we
are on a planet, large or infinite small, with a many times greater
force of gravity compared to B1! Time and size is on our side we won’t
be crawling on all four. (See “THE NUCLEONS BINDING FORCE’)
IST MASS VOLUMN OF BLACK HOLES
By trying to shed some light on to the mass condition of black holes
it is interesting to ask how is light effected if light is generated
and emitted from within an IST situation. That is if light created from
within IST passes the threshold from IST to OST, would light emerge
from that point, as from any other source? Light is not speed effected,
is this right? Lets consider as time slows according to an IST degree
of contraction! Light generated to illuminate a room by a light bulb
of 200 watt at the level of B1 OST, needs only a fraction of that power
in IST! At the 12th step to IST (GTM chart column 12 row 3) were 1 second
at B1 OST equals 1/68719476740 second IST, the light bulb necessary
for IST would be 200w, times 1/68719476740sec. = 2.910383047^{09}
times 3600 seconds = 1.048 x 10^{05} watt. So it is the candlepower
of the light that is effected by IST and not the speed of light even
so it is measured to be different at every Base by an IST observer.
Any light emitted from a cosmic source, at this ratio, would be to dim
to be noticed. Therefor the sun now at step 18, by a (step 12) added
Contraction State, should not emit light. To find the black mass size
of the sun at this level, divide the diameter of the sun (1.393 x 10^{9}
m) by 4096 (GTM chart row 2 column 12), equals 680175m, the sun diameter
is thus 10.24 times smaller then the moon’s diameter. One should
note the star, now as a possible black hole contender, is not zero mass.
For a black hole that has mass as calculated by GTM there has to be
an explanation as to what prevents a total collapse. The reason is provided
by the length contraction of the bound state electron radius according
to GM, which doubles the force of gravity per step, by an increase of
the centripetal force of the electrons. In other words an increasing
outward going force to balance the opposing increasing center mass seeking
force (gravity). THE SECOND POSSIBILLITY! By relativity, if the speed
of C is every where to be the same irrespective in what degree of IST
contraction, this would explain a nonlight emission from a black hole.
If light, is generated in IST (a space craft), its spectrum frequency
would have to adjust to the IST degree of contraction. Light hence elevates
to a higher frequency of magnetic radiation. By the GTM chart, at the
12 contraction to IST, = norm 4096 multiplied by (the frequency of light)
1.0 x 10^{15} HZ = 4.069 x10^{18} HZ. Also no light
is now emitted, the frequency can be measured, and hence the contractionstate
of a black hole can thus be determined by the emission degree, of the
electromagnetic radiation.
THE EARTH CONTRACTED TO ELECTRON DIAMETER BY GTM
If we imagined the sun and the earth to be contracted to the size of
a hydrogen atom Z1, as presumed by GTM from U to U1! Using the GTM
chart, to compute the earth 12,742,000m diameter down to the approx
diameter of an electron! It takes approx. 74 consecutive one half steps
reducing into IST, = 12742000m times 1/1.889 x 10^{22} (the
norm 2^{74} of 74) = 6.746 x 10^{16} m which is approx.
the electron diameter. For this and the following calculations, to appreciate
the approx. relations of these parallels! The 74th step of the GTM chart
is taken as a norm, as ratio of 1/1.8889 x 10^{22} IST to 1
OST (or as a divisor of 1.889 x 10^{22}) for this exercise.
THE SUN CONTRACTED TO THE HYDROGEN NUCLEUS
To compute the sun diameter (1393000000m) down to the hydrogen nucleus
diameter (2.4 x 10^{15}m), using the 74th step! Is as follows,
1393000000m times 1/1888946593 x 10^{22} (the norm) = 7.37427102
x 10^{14}m, which parallels the above by one digit. By using
step 77 it will justify the digits of the powers but only for this calculation
and the one below.
THE HYDROGEN Z1 FREQUENCY BY GTM
To calculate the Z1 atom frequency near to the known value of 6.6 x
10^{15} HZ, by using the distance (the radius 149.5 x 10^{9}m)
between the sun and the earth. Multiplying 149.5 x 10^{9} by
2, times pie = 9.393362034 x 10^{11}m, the earth orbit. That
distance times 1/1.888946593 x 10^{22} (the norm) = 4.972803508
x 10^{11}m this is the approx. electron orbit (radius) length.
For the electron frequency Base 1.888946953 x 10^{22} divided
by 31556909 seconds of one year = 5.985841658 x 10^{14}HZ, this
matches by one digit to the above.
ELECTRON ORBIT RADIUS BY GTM
Since the distance by which a planet orbits the sun (a star) is a gravitational,
mass angular velocity and radius integrated relative variable! There
should be a ratio relation, by GTM, for an electron orbiting a nucleus.
To scale down to the electron orbit, the earth – sun orbit radius
149.5 x 10^{9} m has to be multiplied by 1/1.888946593 x 10^{22}
(the norm) = 7.914464102 x 10^{12}m.
A miss by less than two digits compared to the known electron orbit
of 0.53 x 10^{10} m! To make an excuse, it could be considered
that by some 20th century science and by GTM the electron orbit has
to be elliptic therefor, a tolerance my be allowed.
THE NUCLEONS BINDING FORCE (The strong force)
The norm, row 4 extended by 2 consecutive (2^{74}) 74 times
= 1.888946593 x 10^{22} or the corresponding norm values of
row 1, 2,and 3 are use full in the tracing approx. parallels between
OST and IST (universe and micro universe) values as shown. It should
also be helpful to give some parallel results for the nucleons binding
force. At the norm (column 74 row 4) it says 1.889 x 10^{22}
times the power of gravity compared to B1 OST. That means 1 kg of mass
would be bound to the surface, at this rate of contraction, by a 1.889
x 10^{22}kg force, this seems impossible except to explain energy
conservation in contraction. But, by GTM this presents the earth contracted
to electron size, so it is actually the surface power of gravity of
a condensed planet, not a nucleus. The only thing, this may explain,
could concern particles that have incredible energy or an invisible
mass of an inconceivable force. For thought experiments, if we divide
this power, 1.889 x 10^{22} kg by the IST value of the norm
step 74, row three, 6.74 x 10^{66} seconds = 2.8 x 10^{45
}kg per IST second, gravity is thus
diluted by time. Also according to the norm row 1, the weight has only
to be lifted 1/1.889 x 10^{22}m high. This does not seem quite
right either! It tells so, that an IST weightlifter at step 74 IST by
an equal task to B1 OST has to lift the weight 1/1889x10^{22}m
high in a 1second IST time frame equal to of 6.74x10^{66} seconds
OST. This may hint that under such gravitational condition life may
be possible in a micro dimension like (U1). The only thing to do is
to keep on thinking. The crude mathematics above are only intended as
a vision and guidance, into my postulations, to help to understand the
same and thereby, see the whole from an other angle  by GTM. That’s
why it is called a mathematical explanation. The GTM chart it self in
its values, particularly the time parallel, is hard to conceive, as
at the 103 step for instance 1/1.0 x 10^{93} second IST equals
1 second OST. However, the chart has a logical and mathematical foundation.
I am not aware that mainstream science has a chart, other than formulae
perhaps, concerning relative parallels in mass contraction situations.
One can’t thus ignore GTM because Einstein paved the way with time
dilation and mass elongation. In other words, related change to events
relative to mass conditions. The IST to OST ratio 1:8 is used here to
this point in time. I am trying to find a reason to reduce this ratio
to 1:2 so far without success (see IST event formulae to be published).

{related2} 