A.G.S.P.R.I Australian Gravitational Space Propulsion Reasearch Innovations

AUSTRALIAN GRAVITATIONAL SPACE PROPULSION RESEARCH INNOVATIONS.

MATHEMATICAL EXPLANATION. version 3

This is a mathematical explanation concerning parallels between outer space-time (OST) and inner space-time (IST) calculations, by using the GTM chart. According to an older textbook the mass of our solar system excluding moons comes to 3.505 x 10²⁷ m³ at earth density. That multiplied by approx. 1.0 x 10¹¹ solar systems per galaxy = 3.505 x 10³⁸ m³. That multiplied by 1.0 x 10¹¹ galaxies in the universe = 3.505 x 10⁴⁹ m³ this is the approx. mass of the universe. Convert that into a sphere, the radius of that is approx. 2.23 x 10¹⁶ m, divide that by the speed of light m/s = 74,534,753 sec. (863 days). This is the approx. time (by the rough estimation above) it would take for the big bang to expand the universe, from an ‘electron’ size, to an earth lava-soup stage sphere, at the speed of C, OST (earth Base1). But after the big crunch we are dealing with IST, so we have to convert these 74,534,753 OST seconds each, into IST parallel time quantities. Converting OST to parallel IST, it takes 103 consecutive (2¹⁰³) steps into IST (see GTM chart), from Earth Base1, to an electron size crunch. At this level every one of the above OST seconds is IST time expanded to (2¹⁰³)³ = approx. of 1.04296242 x 10⁹³ seconds, according to the GTM chart. Which really means that one second IST is parallel extended, or equal, to 1.04296242 x 10⁹³ seconds. That is as 74,534,753 time bundles of 1.04296242 x 10⁹³seconds OST B1. Every such time bundle, is time receding in value, during the first 74,534,753 time bundles of the C expansion by the big bang, from, 1.04296242 x 10⁹³ seconds electron size IST ratio to the soup sphere- of step 95 row 3 = (2⁹⁵)³ = 6.22 x 10⁸⁵ seconds and from there expanding to ratio 1:1 seconds B1, earth planetary environment. This means within the time frame of the chemical / nuclear process of B1 as compaired to B(2⁹⁵⁾^.If these receding time quantities are summed up only over 75,534,753 OST seconds to the soup sphere as time sections, the sum is staggering (5.59346051 x 10⁸⁰ years). It is a time lock, an immense black hole. Than receding from this time frame (the last time bundle), of 6.22 x 10⁸⁵ seconds again over approx. 3x 74,534,753 time bundles to ratio 1:1 seconds B1, summed up, as- and to above we have a conventional big bang time (universe age) dilemma. Not to mention the question! What is OST with the universe missing for such a long time? Obviously, one can gauge periods of near empty outer space (OS minus T) with this system, provided that if one universe is closing down another one is not opening up in its wake. That would allow extra reasoning for the mechanics and the cause of the big crunch.

IST POWER OF GRAVITY BY GTM
According to the GTM chart the 12th step (2¹²) into IST row 4 shows a 4096 times increase of gravity. But parallel column 12 at row 3, the time dilation is 1/68719476740 second to one second B1 OST or 1 second IST is equal to 68719476740 seconds OST. This could account for gravity said to be withering away by IST or being diluted by time. This seems to make time more dominant than gravity. Best to understand this is by the mechanics of one (special) man-power were 100 kg are lifted 1m high in one second OST. A person in a 12th step IST situation has (2¹²)³ 6.87 x 10¹⁰ OST seconds, as 1 IST second to lift this weight 1/2048 of one meter. So when we are on a planet, large or infinite small, with a many times greater force of gravity compared to B1! Time and size is on our side we won’t be crawling on all four. (See “THE NUCLEONS BINDING FORCE’)

IST MASS VOLUMN OF BLACK HOLES
By trying to shed some light on to the mass condition of black holes it is interesting to ask how is light effected if light is generated and emitted from within an IST situation. That is if light created from within IST passes the threshold from IST to OST, would light emerge from that point, as from any other source? Light is not speed effected, is this right? Lets consider as time slows according to an IST degree of contraction! Light generated to illuminate a room by a light bulb of 200 watt at the level of B1 OST, needs only a fraction of that power in IST! At the 12th step to IST (GTM chart column 12 row 3) were 1 second at B1 OST equals 1/68719476740 second IST, the light bulb necessary for IST would be 200w, times 1/68719476740sec. = 2.910383047^-09 times 3600 seconds = 1.048 x 10^-05 watt. So it is the candlepower of the light that is effected by IST and not the speed of light even so it is measured to be different at every Base by an IST observer. Any light emitted from a cosmic source, at this ratio, would be to dim to be noticed. Therefor the sun now at step 18, by a (step 12) added Contraction State, should not emit light. To find the black mass size of the sun at this level, divide the diameter of the sun (1.393 x 10⁹ m) by 4096 (GTM chart row 2 column 12), equals 680175m, the sun diameter is thus 10.24 times smaller then the moon’s diameter. One should note the star, now as a possible black hole contender, is not zero mass. For a black hole that has mass as calculated by GTM there has to be an explanation as to what prevents a total collapse. The reason is provided by the length contraction of the bound state electron radius according to GM, which doubles the force of gravity per step, by an increase of the centripetal force of the electrons. In other words an increasing outward going force to balance the opposing increasing center mass seeking force (gravity). THE SECOND POSSIBILLITY! By relativity, if the speed of C is every where to be the same irrespective in what degree of IST contraction, this would explain a non-light emission from a black hole. If light, is generated in IST (a space craft), its spectrum frequency would have to adjust to the IST degree of contraction. Light hence elevates to a higher frequency of magnetic radiation. By the GTM chart, at the 12 contraction to IST, = norm 4096 multiplied by (the frequency of light) 1.0 x 10¹⁵ HZ = 4.069 x10¹⁸ HZ. Also no light is now emitted, the frequency can be measured, and hence the contraction-state of a black hole can thus be determined by the emission degree, of the electromagnetic radiation.

THE EARTH CONTRACTED TO ELECTRON DIAMETER BY GTM
If we imagined the sun and the earth to be contracted to the size of a hydrogen atom Z1, as presumed by GTM from U to U-1! Using the GTM chart, to compute the earth 12,742,000m diameter down to the approx diameter of an electron! It takes approx. 74 consecutive one half steps reducing into IST, = 12742000m times 1/1.889 x 10²² (the norm 2⁷⁴ of 74) = 6.746 x 10^-16 m which is approx. the electron diameter. For this and the following calculations, to appreciate the approx. relations of these parallels! The 74th step of the GTM chart is taken as a norm, as ratio of 1/1.8889 x 10²² IST to 1 OST (or as a divisor of 1.889 x 10²²) for this exercise.

THE SUN CONTRACTED TO THE HYDROGEN NUCLEUS

To compute the sun diameter (1393000000m) down to the hydrogen nucleus diameter (2.4 x 10^-15m), using the 74th step! Is as follows, 1393000000m times 1/1888946593 x 10²² (the norm) = 7.37427102 x 10^-14m, which parallels the above by one digit. By using step 77 it will justify the digits of the powers but only for this calculation and the one below.

THE HYDROGEN Z1 FREQUENCY BY GTM
To calculate the Z1 atom frequency near to the known value of 6.6 x 10¹⁵ HZ, by using the distance (the radius 149.5 x 10⁹m) between the sun and the earth. Multiplying 149.5 x 10⁹ by 2, times pie = 9.393362034 x 10¹¹m, the earth orbit. That distance times 1/1.888946593 x 10²² (the norm) = 4.972803508 x 10^-11m this is the approx. electron orbit (radius) length. For the electron frequency Base 1.888946953 x 10²² divided by 31556909 seconds of one year = 5.985841658 x 10¹⁴HZ, this matches by one digit to the above.

ELECTRON ORBIT RADIUS BY GTM
Since the distance by which a planet orbits the sun (a star) is a gravitational, mass- angular velocity and radius integrated relative variable! There should be a ratio relation, by GTM, for an electron orbiting a nucleus. To scale down to the electron orbit, the earth – sun orbit radius 149.5 x 10⁹ m has to be multiplied by 1/1.888946593 x 10²² (the norm) = 7.914464102 x 10^-12m. A miss by less than two digits compared to the known electron orbit of 0.53 x 10^-10 m! To make an excuse, it could be considered that by some 20th century science and by GTM the electron orbit has to be elliptic therefor, a tolerance my be allowed.

THE NUCLEONS BINDING FORCE (The strong force)
The norm, row 4 extended by 2 consecutive (2⁷⁴) 74 times = 1.888946593 x 10²² or the corresponding norm values of row 1, 2,and 3 are use full in the tracing approx. parallels between OST and IST (universe and micro universe) values as shown. It should also be helpful to give some parallel results for the nucleons binding force. At the norm (column 74 row 4) it says 1.889 x 10²² times the power of gravity compared to B1 OST. That means 1 kg of mass would be bound to the surface, at this rate of contraction, by a 1.889 x 10²²kg force, this seems impossible except to explain energy conservation in contraction. But, by GTM this presents the earth contracted to electron size, so it is actually the surface power of gravity of a condensed planet, not a nucleus. The only thing, this may explain, could concern particles that have incredible energy or an invisible mass of an inconceivable force. For thought experiments, if we divide this power, 1.889 x 10²² kg by the IST value of the norm step 74, row three, 6.74 x 10⁶⁶ seconds = 2.8 x 10^-45kg per IST second, gravity is thus diluted by time. Also according to the norm row 1, the weight has only to be lifted 1/1.889 x 10^-22m high. This does not seem quite right either! It tells so, that an IST weightlifter at step 74 IST by an equal task to B1 OST has to lift the weight 1/1889x10^-22m high in a 1second IST time frame equal to of 6.74x10⁶⁶ seconds OST. This may hint that under such gravitational condition life may be possible in a micro dimension like (U-1). The only thing to do is to keep on thinking. The crude mathematics above are only intended as a vision and guidance, into my postulations, to help to understand the same and thereby, see the whole from an other angle - by GTM. That’s why it is called a mathematical explanation. The GTM chart it self in its values, particularly the time parallel, is hard to conceive, as at the 103 step for instance 1/1.0 x 10⁹³ second IST equals 1 second OST. However, the chart has a logical and mathematical foundation. I am not aware that mainstream science has a chart, other than formulae perhaps, concerning relative parallels in mass contraction situations. One can’t thus ignore GTM because Einstein paved the way with time dilation and mass elongation. In other words, related change to events relative to mass conditions. The IST to OST ratio 1:8 is used here to this point in time. I am trying to find a reason to reduce this ratio to 1:2 so far without success (see IST event formulae to be published).

{related2}

Post Box 3009, Bundeena, NSW, 2230 AUSTRALIA gunther@agspri.com