HOME

THE KEY TO THE UNIVERSE 1986

INTRODUCTION TO GRAVITATIONAL MECHANICS & GRAVITATIONAL TIME MECHANICS

LETTER TO SCIENCE

THE GRAVITATIONAL MECHANICS (GM 2001)

THE GRAVITATIONAL TIME MECHANICS (GTM) 2001

THE WISE MEN AGSPRI AND THE POEM

GRAVITY RELATED INNOVATIONS

NON GRAVITY RELATED INNOVATIONS OR INVENTIONS

THE MACHINE & THE SPACESHIP

REQUSTED PUBLICATIONS :-UPDATES

LINKS

MATHEMATICAL EXPLANATION. VERSION 2

This is a mathematical explanation concerning parallels between outer space-time (OST) and inner space-time (IST) calculations, by using the GTM chart. According to an older textbook the mass of our solar system excluding moons comes to 1.99 x 10³⁰ kg. That multiplied by approx. 1.0 x 10¹¹ solar systems per galaxy = 1.99 x 10⁴¹ kg. That multiplied by 1.0 x 10¹¹ galaxies in the universe = 1.99 x 10⁵² kg is the approx. mass of the universe. Convert that into the planet earth density of 5975 kg per cubic meter = approx. 2.84 x 10⁴⁷ cubic meter, the approx. volume of the stars and planetary mass of the universe. Convert that into a sphere, the radius of that is approx. 4.08 x 10¹⁵ m, divide that by the speed of light = 13645485 sec. (157.9 days). This is the approx. time (by the rough estimation above) it would take for the big bang to expand the universe, from an electron size, to an earth lava-soup stage sphere, at the speed of C, OST. But after the big crunch we are dealing with IST, so we have to convert these 13645485 OST seconds each, into IST seconds. Converting OST to IST, it takes 103 consecutive (2¹⁰³ ) steps into IST (see GTM chart), from this size soup sphere to an electron size crunch. At this level one OST second is time expanded to (2¹⁰³ )³ approx. (1 bundle of) 1.04296242 x 10⁹³ seconds IST, according to the GTM chart. Which really means that one second IST is extended, or equal, to 1.04296242 x 10⁹³ seconds OST B1. Every IST bundle, is time receding in value, during the first 13645485 seconds of expansion by the big bang, from, 1.04296242 x 10⁹³ seconds to 1 x 1 seconds! If these receding time quantities are summed up over 13645485 OST seconds as time sections, the sum is staggering. It is a time lock, an immense black hole. Even conventional, (the big crunch big bang soup sphere) the soup sphere has approx. 3.33 x 10²⁵ times the mass of the earth and therefor approx. some 3.33 x 10²⁵ times the earth surface power of gravity (B1). This calculated by the GTM chart extends to step 85 (2⁸⁵) row 3 (2⁸⁵)³= 5.79 x 10⁷⁶ seconds IST, a time dilation from 1 second OST or 1/5.79 x 10⁷⁶ second IST = 1 second OST at B1. That is by conventional science, a significant retarded flow of time (On hindsight, the soup stage would actually have to be calculated operating receding from this time frame). That first time bundle, of 5.79 x 10⁷⁶ seconds, receding over 13645485 time bundles to 1 x 1 seconds, summed up, as above and we have a conventional big bang time (universe age) dilemma. Not to mention the question! What is OST good for with the universe missing for such a long time? Obviously, one can gauge periods of empty outer space (OS minus T) with this system, provided that while one universe is closing down another one is not opening up in its wake. That would give an extra reason for the mechanics and the cause of the big crunch. This above makes only sense in an observers frame, of time relativity, to IST mass condition, it can not be viewed from OST. Because in this time frame OST B1 does not really exist any more!

IST POWER OF GRAVITY BY GTM

According to the GTM chart the 12^th step (2¹²) into IST row 4 shows a 4096 times increase of gravity. But parallel column 12 at row 3, the time dilation is 1/68719476747 second to one second B1 OST or 1 second IST is equal to 68719476747 seconds OST. This could account for gravity said to be withering away by IST or being diluted by time. This seems to make time more dominant than gravity. Best to understand this is by the mechanics of one (special) horsepower were 100 kg are lifted 1m high in one second OST. A person in a 12^th step IST situation has (2¹²) = 6.87x 10¹⁰ seconds IST to lift this weight 1/2048 of one meter. So when we are on a planet, large or infinite small, with a many times greater force of gravity compared to B1! Time and size is on our side we won’t be crawling on all four. (See "THE NUCLEASE BINDING FORCE’)

IST MASS VOLUMN OF BLACK HOLES

To shed some light on to the mass condition of black holes here are some calculations using the GTM chart. If the speed of light 2.99792458 x10⁸ m/s is every where the same! Than if it is tested in an IST environment where 1 second OST is time dilated (slowed down) to IST ratio 1:2.99792458 x 10⁸ seconds OST! An IST observer would measure the light velocity to be 1m/sec instead c is measured at B2 as 2c. Once the light passes the threshold from IST to OST, light would emerge from that point, as from any other source. Light is not speed effected , is this right? Lets consider as time slows according to an IST degree of contraction! Light generated to illuminate a room by a light bulb of 200 watt at the level of B1 OST, needs only a fraction of that power in IST! At the 12^th step to IST (GTM chart column 12 row 3) were 1 second at B1 OST equals 1/68719476747 second IST, the light bulb necessary for IST would be 200w, times 1/68719476747sec. = 2.91038057 x10^-09 times 3600 seconds = 1.048 x 10^-05 watt. Therefor it is the candle power of the light that is effected by IST and not the speed of light even so it is measured to be different at every base by an IST observer. Any light emitted from such a cosmic source, at this ratio, would be to dim to be noticed. Therefor the sun, at the above contraction state, should not emit light. To find the black mass size of the sun at this level, we divide the diameter of the sun (1.393 x 10⁹ m) by 4096(GTM chart row 2 column 12), equals 680175m, the sun diameter is thus 10.24 times smaller then the moon’s diameter. Please note the star, now as a possable black hole contender , is not zero mass. This agrees well using the GTM chart as above but calculated from an other angle it creates an ugly fact. To overcome this one must presume that light generated in IST, is IST light and its power is relative to that environment. THE SECOND POSSIBILLITY! By relativity, if C is measured every were to be the same irrespective in what degree of IST contraction, this would explain a non-light emission from a black hole but in a strange way. If light, is generated in IST, its spectrum frequency would have to adjust to the IST degree of contraction. Light hence elevates to a higher frequency of magnetic radiation. By the GTM chart, at the 12 contraction to IST, 1sec. IST = 68719476747 sec. OST, multiplied by (the frequency of light) 1.0 x 10¹⁵ HZ = 6.8719476747 x 10²⁵ HZ. Also no light is now emitted, the frequency can be measured, hence the contraction-state of a black hole can thus be determined by the emission degree, of the electromagnetic radiation. By using the GTM chart, in the reverse process to above, this will give the same (sun contraction) result.THE MAINSTREAM RESOLUTION! Conventional a black hole is explained where light is bending inward by the increasing surface power of gravity, as the star collapses further. To explain this by GTM, photons would have to be atoms of U-2 (see GTM 2001). Thus these atoms can be controlled by a frequency source. The ray of light could be reversed, by a gravitational frequency of U-2 (see the dimension chart) in the vicinity of 8.3 x 10²⁷ Hz. This makes sense, light bends, it agrees with Einstein. Question, since nothing is to escape that power of gravity should this include UHF.etc.?

THE EARTH CONTRACTED TO ELECTRON DIAMETER BY GTM

If we imagined the sun and the earth to be contracted to the size of a hydrogen atom Z1, as presumed by GTM from U to U-1! Using the GTM chart, to compute the earth 12,742,000m diameter down to the approx. diameter of an electron! It takes approx. 74 consecutive one half steps reducing into IST, = 12742000m times 1/1.889 x 10²² (a norm (2⁷⁴) of step 74) = 6.746 x 10^-16 m which is approx. the electron diameter. For this and the following calculations, to appreciate the approx. relations of these parallels! The 74^th step of the GTM chart is taken as a norm, as ratio of 1/1.8889 x 10²² IST to OST (or as a divisor of 1.889 x 10²²) for this exercise.

THE SUN CONTRACTED TO THE HYDROGEN NUCLEUS

To compute the sun diameter (1393000000m) down to the hydrogen nucleus diameter (2.4 x 10^-15m), using the 74^th step! Is as follows, 1393000000m times 1/1888946593 x 10²² (the norm) = 7.37427102 x 10^-14m, which parallels the above by one digit. By using step 77 it will justify the digits of the powers but only for this calculation and the one below.

THE HYDROGEN Z1 FREQUENCY BY GTM

To calculate the Z1 atom frequency near to the known value of 6.6 x 10¹⁵ HZ, by using the distance (the radius 149.5 x 10⁹m) between the sun and the earth. Multiplying 149.5 x 10⁹ by 2, times pie = 9.393362034 x 10¹¹m, the earth orbit. That distance times 1/1.888946593 x 10²² (the norm) = 4.972803508 x 10^-11m this is the approx. electron orbit length. Now the earth orbit above divided by that electron orbit (as for every electron orbit distance there is one electron orbit vibration) = 1.888946953 x 10²² per year, divided by 31449600 seconds of one year = 6.006267021 x 10¹⁴ HZ, this matches by one digit to the above..

ELECTRON ORBIT RADIUS BY GTM

Since the distance by which a planet orbits the sun (a star) is a gravitational, mass- angular velocity and radius integrated relative variable! There should be a ratio relation, by GTM, for an electron orbiting a nucleus. To scale down to the electron orbit, the earth — sun orbit radius 149.5 x 10⁹ m has to be multiplied by 1/1.888946593 x 10²² (the norm) = 7.914464102 x 10^-12m. A miss by less than two digits compared to the known electron orbit of 0.53 x 10^-10 m! To make an excuse, it could be considered that by some 20^th century science and by GTM the electron orbit has to be elliptic therefor, a tolerance my be allowed.

THE NUCLEONS BINDING FORCE

The norm, row 4 extended by 2 compound 74 times = 1/1.888946593 x 10²² or the corresponding norm values of row 1, 2,and 3 are use full in the tracing approx. parallels between OST and IST (universe and micro universe) values as shown. It should also be helpful to give some parallel results for the nucleons binding force. At the norm (column 74 row 4) it says 1.889 x 10²² times the power of gravity compared to B1 OST. That means 1 kg of mass would be bound to the surface, at this rate of contraction, by a 1.889 x 10²²kg force, this seems impossible except to explain energy conservation in contraction. But, by GTM this presents the earth contracted to electron size, so it is actually the surface power of gravity of a condensed planet, not a nucleus. The only thing, this may explain, could concern particles that have incredible energy. For thought experiments, if we divide this power, 1.889 x 10²² kg by the IST value of the norm, row three, 6.74 x 10⁶⁶ = 2.8 x 10^{- 45} kg per IST second, gravity is thus diluted by time. Also according to the norm row 1, the weight has only to be lifted 1/1.889 x 10^-22m high. This does not seem quite right either! It tells so that an IST weight lifter at step 74 IST by an equal task to B1 OST has to lift the weight 1/1889x10^-22 m high in a one second IST time frame equal to 6.74x10⁶⁶ seconds OST.This may hint under such gravitational condition that life may be possible in a micro dimension like (U-1). The only thing to do is to keep on thinking. The crude mathematics above are only intended as a vision and guidance, into my postulations, to help to understand the same and thereby, see the whole from an other angle. That’s why it is called a mathematical explanation. The GTM chart it self in its values, particularly the time parallel, is hard to conceive, as at the 103 step for instance 1/1.0 x 10⁹³ second IST equals 1 second OST. However, the chart has a logical and mathematical foundation. I am not aware that mainstream science has a chart, other than formulae perhaps, concerning relative parallels in mass contraction situations. One can’t thus ignore GTM because Einstein paved the way with time dilation and mass elongation. In other words, related change to relative mass conditions. The IST to OST ratio 1:8 is used here to this point in time. I am trying to find a reason to reduce this ratio to 1:2 , so far with out success.

Letter to science 2002

letter to science 4/2004

GTM 2004 Update